Object Oriented Analysis and Design

Participants Information

Participants:25
Speakers:13
Female participants:01
Male participants:24
Participants from SC/ST category:11

Lab Sessions

  • Refactoring OO Legacy Code Lab
  • Designing OOAD with UML Lab
  • Introduction to test Automation Lab
  • Hp Quick Test Professional Lab
  • Test Object Model, Object Repository, Function Racovery Scenerio Manager Lab
  • UML Modeling Lab
  • Automation Tool and Hands on Test Automation Lab

Topics Covered

  • Introduction to Object Oriented Life Cycles
  • Object View, Use-Case View, Activity View
  • Object Oriented Analysis Process
  • Designing Classes
  • Sofware Project Planning
  • Rumbugh, Booch, Jacobson Methods, Object Oriented Architecture Models
  • Designing Objects and Responsibilities
  • Software Project Management, Object Oriented Software Process Models
  • Designing Classes and Objects, Designing Interface Objects
  • Impact of Object Orientation on Testing, Introduction to OO Testing
  • Introduction to OO Testing, Object Oriented Testing Methodologies
  • Checkpoints Synchronization, Data Driven Testing
  • Object Oriented Methodology, Business Process Modeling
  • Why UMl Modeling, Software Risk Management
  • Software Project Management

Highlights

List of External Speakers


Deepu Chandra, Developer, AT & T Hyderabad

Sudheer, Developer, CA Hyderabad

Manish Tiwari, Scientist-D, DRDO Hyderabad

Srinu. B, Faculty, NIT Calicut

Venkat Swamy, Developer, CA Technologies

Kondal Rao, Developer, Accenture Technologies

Venu, Pinacle Info Tech, Hyderabad

Rajsekhar, Developer, Interactive Tech Hyderabad

Rama Krishna, Developer, Swan Technologies Hyderabad


List of Internal Speakers


Prof. D. V. L. N. Somayajulu, Chair, E & ICT Academy, NIT Warangal

Ravi Chandra Sadam, Assistant Professor, NIT Warangal

Vijay. S, Faculty, NIT Warangal

Raju Bhukya, Assistant Professor, NIT Warangal


Feedback Summary

  • FDP was relevant and added value to the profession of participants.

  • Content and delivered material was appropriate.

  • The program structure was well organized.

  • Good amount of time was spent on Hands - on.

    • Suggestions from Participants

  • More topics should be covered on design.