Internet of Things @ B V Raju Institute of Technology (UGC Autonomous), Narsapur



Participants Information

Participants: 47
Speakers:03
Female participants:15
Male participants:32
Participants from SC/ST category:06
Research Scholars:None

Topics Covered

  • CC3200 Platform, Value Line Architecture
  • Features and Peripherals, Connectivity Solutins using CC3200 Wi-Fi Accessing
  • Working with Serial Interface, Wireless interface (RF), Multiple peripherals as a system
  • Creation of own Web Server and Web page. Exercise on web server with different web pages to control the Hardware
  • Working with MQTT protocol and pushing the sensor data to the IBM cloud
  • Data acquisition and control using the cloud server with the user interface as Mobile APP and web
  • Getting weather information from cloud server using CC3200 Wi-Fi
  • Working with Temboo and Yahoo
  • Getting connected with Thingspeak Cloud platform and sending sensor information
  • Getting connected with AT&T Cloud platform and sending sensor information
  • Introduction to BCI and EEG Data Collection, BCI controlled wheel chair
  • MSP430 Launch Pad Architecture launch pad features
  • BLYNK Application to control launch pad
  • Controlling TIV A using the Google Assistance
  • IOT Architectural View Design principles for connected devices
  • IOT and its roadmap, Opportunities & Challenges in implementing IOT Solutions

Highlights

List of Speakers

Mr. V. S. Ramesh, Director, Texas Instruments


Dr. Raju Bhukya, Assistant Professor, NIT Warangal


Dr. Rajeev Gupta, Technical Director, STEPS Software LTD.




Feedback Summary

  • All resource persons were highly knowledgeable and effective explanation with great patience.

  • The concept of WSN and enhancing the approach of application based communication was good.

  • Articulation was good by the Texas instrument university facilitator.

  • Very good sessions and teaching methodology.

  • The way of explaining the content by using ppt’s was excellent.

  • Suggestions from Participants

  • Effective hands on approach but Required more hands on session.

  • Required more detailed explanation of protocol programming.

  • Before the start of the workshop, material would have been circulated for more efficiency of the learner.